Learning Outside of School and Self-Directed Learning (SDL)

Lauren Resnick’s The 1987 Presidential Address: Learning in School and Out illustrates the stark contrast between the traditional in-school model of learning and out of school learning. Out of school learning is usually more authentic in the respect that learning is socially shared, tool centered, and all actions are directly connected to events; while the traditional school model measures students individually and uses simulations to represent real world tools. The Internet can be a great medium for learning outside of school because it offers many collaborative opportunities such as wiki’s, social networking, Google Docs, etc. It also allows the learner to use tools that are applicable to the learner’s current or future profession.

In the above video Kevin Kelly described the internet’s impact on self-directed learning. There is an ever constant fear amongst the general public that new technology will envelop our lives to the point that we become sedentary and completely dependent upon the new technology. Before I watched Kelly’s talk, I always viewed this as a black and white issue. One could either argue that technology would take over our lives in a negative way, or that tools would always remain tools from which we could always step away from; never becoming dependent. However, he categorizes the internet as a technology tool that is progressively enveloping our lives, that we are/will become completely dependent on it, and that this is in fact desirable

In his talk, Kelly provides his perspective on digital age tools by linking to similar non-digital innovations.

 Kelly says, “… I want to talk about…this idea that we are going to be co-dependent … I have now gotten to the point where I don’t try to remember things, I just Google it. It’s just easier to do that. And we kind of object at first and saying, ‘oh that’s awful’. But if we think about the dependency that we have on this other technology called the alphabet and writing, we’re totally dependent on it. It’s transformed culture. We cannot imagine ourselves without the alphabet and writing, and so in the same way we’re going to not imagine ourselves without this other machine not being there.”

While I would argue that the web is a communicator of knowledge and language (much more so than an actual language in itself), comparing the web to a language offers a good illustration of how co-dependency can be a positive thing. It touches on Resnick’s argument that tools don’t eliminate or destroy intelligence, it simply shifts responsibility. Kelly says we don’t try to remember things, we just Google them. Resnick would say knowledge isn’t lost to Google it’s just in a different location. I see no problem with this conservation theory; in fact it’s desirable that knowledge be communicable and readily accessible. However being able to export ideas should make room to construct more complex thought, not take all burden off the learner. The calculator shifts the responsibility of solving simple equations from the brain to a tool so that more thought can be put towards complex equations. Google has aided learning via the internet in a similar manner.

The web is always with us on our laptops, phones, vehicles, and other devices. Letting the web flow around us at all times allows for immediate tap in to the pool of knowledge available. I believe very strongly in the relevant timing of instruction. During the 2008 presidential race I was teaching sections of AP political science and was able to integrate current events into my unit on the American election process by way of the internet with tools such as 270towin.com. Unfortunately the curriculum rarely aligns itself to events in the outside world and the students’ current state of mind like this. In self-directed learning, the curriculum will vary depending on student interest, however content is always relevant. If I happened to be watching a movie and was interested in a particular actor/actress’s work and wanted to know more about them, Wikipedia or IMDB are resources that I might tap into to direct my desire to continue my learning. Learning in this way is always sparked by current interest, is immediately satisfied with further exploration for understanding, and is delivered in adequate doses because it is at the learners’ discretion when to cease the learning process. I take great interest in learning how I can translate this self-directed learning into the more structured environment of the traditional classroom.

Wiki’s & Collaborative Constructions

This post is all about Wiki's!
Ok, maybe wiki's don't warrant an exclamation. But they can be powerful collaborative tools. Wikipedia by itself has changed the way people access information. How amazing is it that everyone can contribute their individual knowledge and research towards one single entity like that? Essentially we can synthesize all of the world’s knowledge and have full access to it as long as we have internet connectivity.
While Wikipedia has had its issues with users providing inaccurate information, I believe that it has become more consistent the longer it has been around. There is no doubt in my mind that it can continue to trend this way the longer it has to establish itself.
Today, I contributed to the John Glenn High School (Westland, MI) page on Wikipedia.
When I searched for the school, I found a stub article containing little more than a few sentences and a link to the school’s website.
Here’s what it looked like:

I had stumbled upon an e-portfolio of a former student teacher at JGHS some time back, and decided to contact Brian Galvin to ask if it would be ok to use his brief history of JGHS for the Wikipedia article.
I know that Wikipedia need not have 100% factual information, just verifiable information. But I figured since I had his email that I would extend the courtesy.
His response back was emphaitic with approval, but he also told me where he got his information from: Two teachers that had been teaching at JGHS since it opened in 1964!
As a man who loves history, I would have loved to sit in on that conversation.
Anyways… I added a history section that also was cause to add the page’s first refrences. I also looked up the geographic coordinates of the school and added those as well. Here’s a look at the changes:

After I finished with Wikipedia, I set out to create my own wiki. I must have played around with my newly created account on wikispaces for four hours before I figured out what I wanted to do: A handbook of technologies and their educational application(s).
I’m very much intrigued with the idea of pulling the outside world into my instruction, so I thought… why not pull in outside contributors?
I have friends and contacts across all career paths. Often, in conversation my friends mention something that sparks an educational idea for me. Maybe it helps a lesson or maybe it helps me to address behavioral issues… the bottom line is that it helps.
I wanted to create a wiki that focused on technology use in education that could be contributed to by individuals who have either have experience with teaching or experience with technology. This way maybe we could synthesize these areas of expertise and use technology more effectively because of it.
Right now, in order to make sure to establish a sustainable process, contributors are added by invite only. Let me know if you would be interested, and I’ll send you an invite.
Thanks for the read!